In the Introduction, Bates says that euphemizing issues surrounding misogyny and the manosphere contribute to its continued influence. She argues that its harmful rhetoric must be confronted directly. What effect does her use of explicit quotes and unfiltered language have? Do you agree that this is an effective strategy? Why or why not?

Bates often uses personal anecdotes and real-life case studies to highlight the impacts of misogyny. Analyze how her use of narratives functions as a persuasive tool.

The book’s chapters compare and contrast the different facets of the manosphere, highlighting nuances in their beliefs and actions. What underlying values hold these communities together despite their differences?