logo

Powers of Horror

Julia Kristeva

Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection

Julia Kristeva

  • 51-page comprehensive Study Guide
  • Chapter-by-chapter summaries and multiple sections of expert analysis
  • Featured in our Philosophy, Logic, & EthicsGood & EvilFear collections
  • The ultimate resource for assignments, engaging lessons, and lively book discussions

Powers of Horror Chapters 3-5 Summary & Analysis

Chapter 3 Summary: “From Filth to Defilement”

Chapter 3 begins with a discussion of Freud’s theory that religion and morality are rooted in two taboos: murder and incest. Kristeva writes that Freud’s position on murder has been well-established. However, she believes he has incorrectly overlooked the issue of incest. By focusing on incest, Kristeva reveals that the danger of incest is not so much a societal danger but rather the fearful danger of nondifferentiation. That is, the evolving subject in the preverbal developmental stage has not differentiated themselves from the object. The fear resides in the subject’s potential for never separating from the mother and being subsumed by her. The developing subject then moves toward the un-naming of the mother, the relegation of the mother as “Other,“ and the ultimate rejection of the maternal/feminine in favor of the symbolic father. For Kristeva, the subject-in-process’s fear is not castration or losing body parts but being subsumed by the mother.

Kristeva next turns toward discussing ways religion shifts secular filth to sacred defilement. She references Mary Douglas’s work on defilement, then argues that “filth is not a quality itself, but it applies only to what relates to a boundary and, more particularly, represents the object jettisoned out of that boundary, its other side, a margin” (69).

blurred text

Unlock this
Study Guide!

Join SuperSummary to gain instant access to all 51 pages of this Study Guide and thousands of other learning resources.
Get Started
blurred text